Vardon v. City of Montgomery, Alabama Retirement Fund(MAG+)

Filing 41

ORDER as follows: 1. The plaintiff's 40 Objection to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is OVERRULED. 2. The 39 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. 3. The defendant's 35 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 6/29/2012. (dmn, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
JAMES M. VARDON,
Plaintiff,
v.

Case No. 2:11-cv-352-MEF-CSC
(WO)

CITY OF MONTGOMERY,
ALABAMA, RETIREMENT FUND,
Defendant.

ORDER
Magistrate Judge Coody has filed a Recommendation (Doc. # 39) that this Court
grant the defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 35). Upon an independent
review of the file, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1.

The plaintiff’s Objection to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge
(Doc. # 40) is OVERRULED.

2.

The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 39) is
ADOPTED.

3.

The defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 35) is
GRANTED.

Done this the 29th day of June, 2012.
/s/ Mark E. Fuller
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1