Badillo v. United States of America (INMATE 3)

Filing 10

ORDERED that the 9 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED and the 28 USC § 2255 motion filed by Petitioner is denied, as it was filed after expiration of the one-year limitation period in 28 USC § 2255(f). Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 5/24/2013. (wcl, )

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
CARLOS BADILLO,
Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Civil Action No. 2:11cv354-MEF

ORDER
The Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (Doc. 9) in this case to which no
timely objections have been filed. After a review of the Recommendation, and after an
independent review of the entire record, the court finds that the Recommendation should be
adopted. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that the Recommendation (Doc. 9) of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED
and the 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion filed by Petitioner is denied, as it was filed after expiration
of the one-year limitation period in 28 U.S.C. § 2255(f).
DONE this the 24th day of May, 2013.
/s/ Mark E. Fuller
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE