Badillo v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
ORDERED that the 9 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED and the 28 USC § 2255 motion filed by Petitioner is denied, as it was filed after expiration of the one-year limitation period in 28 USC § 2255(f). Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 5/24/2013. (wcl, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Civil Action No. 2:11cv354-MEF
The Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (Doc. 9) in this case to which no
timely objections have been filed. After a review of the Recommendation, and after an
independent review of the entire record, the court finds that the Recommendation should be
adopted. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that the Recommendation (Doc. 9) of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED
and the 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion filed by Petitioner is denied, as it was filed after expiration
of the one-year limitation period in 28 U.S.C. § 2255(f).
DONE this the 24th day of May, 2013.
/s/ Mark E. Fuller
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?