Likely v. Struzick et al (INMATE 1)

Filing 27

ORDER directing that, there being no timely objection filed to the 25 Recommendation, and after a review of the file, the 25 Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows: (1) The Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; (2) Judgment is GRANTED in favor of the Defendants; (3) This case is DISMISSED with prejudice; (4) Each party shall bear their own costs. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 9/4/14. (scn, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION ANGELA LIKELY, on behalf of her minor son T.R.J., ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, vs. BETTY STRUZICK, et al., Defendants. CASE NO. 2:11cv358-WHA (WO) ORDER This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #25), entered on August 14, 2014. There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and after a review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. 2. Judgment is GRANTED in favor of the Defendants. 3. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. 4. Each party shall bear their own costs. DONE this 4th day of September, 2014. /s/ W. Harold Albritton W. HAROLD ALBRITTON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?