Likely v. Struzick et al (INMATE 1)

Filing 7

ORDER adopting 5 RECOMMENDATION; dismissing the Plaintiff's claims against Mt. Meigs DYS / Mt. Meigs Complex with prejudice; dismissing Mt. Meigs DYS / Mt Meigs Complex as a defendant; referring the case, with respect to the allegations against the remaining individual defendants, back to the Magistrate for appropriate proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 6/9/2011. (br, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION ANGELA LIKELY, on behalf of her minor son T.R.J., Plaintiff, v. MT. MEIGS DYS, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:11-cv-358-TMH ORDER The Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (Doc. #5) in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. After a review of the Recommendation, and after an independent review of the entire record, the Court believes that the Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. the Recommendation (Doc. #5) of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; 2. Plaintiff’s claims against the Mt. Meigs DYS/Mt. Meigs Complex are DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to the directives of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); 3. the Mt. Meigs DYS/Mt. Meigs Complex is DISMISSED from this cause of action; 4. this case, with respect to the allegations set forth against the remaining individual defendants, is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for appropriate proceedings. Done this 9 th day of June, 2011. /s/ Truman M. Hobbs UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?