Johnson v. Boyd et al (INMATE2)

Filing 27

OPINION and ORDER directing that, upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the 26 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows that: (1) The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judg e be and is hereby ADOPTED; (2) The defendant's motion for summary judgment (doc. # 15 ) be and is hereby GRANTED; (3) That this case be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice; (4) Costs be and are hereby TAXED against the plaintiff, as further set out. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 2/4/14. (scn, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION DEMARQUIES JOHNSON, # 178713, Plaintiff, v. SHARON BLAKELY, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIV. ACT. NO. 2:11cv360-WHA OPINION and ORDER On January 6, 2014, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 26). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows that: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED; 2. The defendant’s motion for summary judgment (doc. # 15) be and is hereby GRANTED. 3. That this case be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. 4. Costs be and are hereby TAXED against the plaintiff. An appropriate judgment will be entered. Done this the 4th day of February, 2014. /s/ W. Harold Albritton W. HAROLD ALBRITTON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?