Ridley v. Hetzel et al (INMATE 3)

Filing 17

ORDER AND OPINION; it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the 15 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED and that: 1) The 28 USC § 2254 petition for habeas corpus relief, as amended (Doc. Nos. 1 and 3 ), are DENIED and that this case is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction; 2) The motions seeking a preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order (Doc. Nos. 10 , 11 , and 13 ) are DENIED as moot. Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 8/9/2011. (wcl, )

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
EDWARD RIDLEY, #276808,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Petitioner,
v.
GARY HETZEL, et al.,
Respondents.

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:11cv377-TMH

ORDER AND OPINION
On July 7, 2011, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which
no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 15). Upon an independent review of the file
in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be
and is hereby ADOPTED and that:
1.

The 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for habeas corpus relief, as amended (Doc. Nos.
1 and 3), are DENIED and that this case is DISMISSED for lack of
jurisdiction.

2.

The motions seeking a preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order
(Doc. Nos. 10, 11, and 13) are DENIED as moot.

Done this the 9 th day of August, 2011.
/s/ Truman M. Hobbs
________________________________________
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE