Riggins v. Bates et al (INMATE 1)

Filing 87

ORDER directing that the 85 Objection to Report and Recommendation is OVERRULED; further ORDERING that the 80 Report and Recommendation of the Magist Judge is ADOPTED, that plaintiff's 60 , 74 cross-motion for summary judgment is DENIED, and that defendants' 11 motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 6/26/14. (djy, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION DARRYL D. RIGGINS, #184051, Plaintiff, v. DR. BATES, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:11-CV-422-WKW [WO] ORDER Before the court are the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 80) and Plaintiff’s timely filed objection (Doc. # 85). Based upon the court’s independent and de novo review of those portions of the Recommendation to which objection is made, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), it is ORDERED that the objection is OVERRULED. It is further ORDERED that the Recommendation (Doc. # 80) is ADOPTED, that Plaintiff’s cross-motion for summary judgment (Docs. # 60, 74) is DENIED, and that Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. # 11) is GRANTED. An appropriate judgment will be entered. DONE this 26th day of June, 2014. /s/ W. Keith Watkins CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?