Riggins v. Bates et al (INMATE 1)

Filing 87

ORDER directing that the 85 Objection to Report and Recommendation is OVERRULED; further ORDERING that the 80 Report and Recommendation of the Magist Judge is ADOPTED, that plaintiff's 60 , 74 cross-motion for summary judgment is DENIED, and that defendants' 11 motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 6/26/14. (djy, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
DARRYL D. RIGGINS, #184051,
Plaintiff,
v.
DR. BATES, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. 2:11-CV-422-WKW
[WO]

ORDER
Before the court are the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 80)
and Plaintiff’s timely filed objection (Doc. # 85). Based upon the court’s independent
and de novo review of those portions of the Recommendation to which objection is
made, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), it is ORDERED that the objection is OVERRULED. It is
further ORDERED that the Recommendation (Doc. # 80) is ADOPTED, that
Plaintiff’s cross-motion for summary judgment (Docs. # 60, 74) is DENIED, and that
Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. # 11) is GRANTED.
An appropriate judgment will be entered.
DONE this 26th day of June, 2014.
/s/ W. Keith Watkins
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE