Riggins v. Bates et al (INMATE 1)
ORDER directing that the 85 Objection to Report and Recommendation is OVERRULED; further ORDERING that the 80 Report and Recommendation of the Magist Judge is ADOPTED, that plaintiff's 60 , 74 cross-motion for summary judgment is DENIED, and that defendants' 11 motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 6/26/14. (djy, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
DARRYL D. RIGGINS, #184051,
DR. BATES, et al.,
CASE NO. 2:11-CV-422-WKW
Before the court are the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 80)
and Plaintiff’s timely filed objection (Doc. # 85). Based upon the court’s independent
and de novo review of those portions of the Recommendation to which objection is
made, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), it is ORDERED that the objection is OVERRULED. It is
further ORDERED that the Recommendation (Doc. # 80) is ADOPTED, that
Plaintiff’s cross-motion for summary judgment (Docs. # 60, 74) is DENIED, and that
Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. # 11) is GRANTED.
An appropriate judgment will be entered.
DONE this 26th day of June, 2014.
/s/ W. Keith Watkins
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?