Arthur v. Thomas et al (DEATH PENALTY)

Filing 117

ORDERED that Dfts file a response to Plf's 107 Objections regarding (1) Judge Moorer's 89 Order denying Plf's Motion to Compel Entry Upon Land for Inspection; and (2) Judge Moorer's 99 Sealed Order on or before 11/9/2012. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 10/31/2012. (wcl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION THOMAS D. ARTHUR, Plaintiff, v. KIM THOMAS, Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:11-cv-438-MEF (WO – Do Not Publish) ORDER Before the Court is Plaintiff Thomas Arthur’s Objections and Responses to United States Magistrate Judge Terry Moorer’s Orders of October 10 and October 12, 2012. (Doc. #107.) It is hereby ORDERED that Defendants file a response to Plaintiff’s objections regarding (1) Judge Moorer’s October 10, 2012 Order denying Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Entry Upon Land for Inspection (Doc. #89); and (2) Judge Moorer’s October 12, 2012 Sealed Order (Doc. #99) on or before November 9, 2012. DONE this the 31st day of October, 2012. /s/ Mark E. Fuller UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?