Arthur v. Thomas et al (DEATH PENALTY)

Filing 146

ORDER that Plaintiff's 144 Motion for Clarification of 3/14/2013 Order is GRANTED. Plaintiff is not required to file a motion for summary judgment on or before 4/5/2013, and the Court will consider Plaintiff's opposition and supporting ev idence to any dispositive motion filed by Defendants. Pursuant to the briefing schedule set forth in the Court's 138 Order of 2/15/2013, Plaintiff shall file his response to Defendants' summary judgment motion on or before 4/19/2013. Defendants may file a reply on or before 4/26/2013. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 3/15/2013. (dmn, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
THOMAS D. ARTHUR,
Plaintiff,
v.
KIM THOMAS,
Commissioner, Alabama Department
of Corrections, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. 2:11-cv-438-MEF
(WO – Do Not Publish)

ORDER
Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Clarification of March 14, 2013 Order (Doc.
#144). It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion (Doc. #144) is GRANTED. Plaintiff
is not required to file a motion for summary judgment on or before April 5, 2013, and the
Court will consider Plaintiff’s opposition and supporting evidence to any dispositive motion
filed by Defendants. Pursuant to the briefing schedule set forth in the Court’s order of
February 15, 2013 (Doc. #138), Plaintiff shall file his response to Defendants’ summary
judgment motion on or before April 19, 2013. Defendants may file a reply on or before April
26, 2013.
DONE this the 15th day of March, 2013.
/s/ Mark E. Fuller
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE