Banks v. Jackson Hospital & Clinic, Inc. et al

Filing 59

OPINION AND ORDER: It is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Defendant Jackson Hospital & Clinic, Inc.' 38 Motion for fees is granted. (2) Defendant Jackson Hospital & Clinic, Inc. is entitled to $203.75 in fees. (3) The above-referenced fees must be paid, within 14 days, by plaintiff Viola H. Bank's counsel and are not to be born by the plaintiff Banks herself. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 5/8/2012. (dmn, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION VIOLA H. BANKS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) JACKSON HOSPITAL & CLINIC, ) INC., ) ) Defendant. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:11cv462-MHT (WO) OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Viola H. Banks brought this lawsuit against defendant Jackson Hospital & Clinic, Inc., alleging raceand age-based discrimination. On February 21, 2012, this court granted Banks’s motion to extend time to file her response to the hospital’s motion for summary judgment on the condition that Banks’s counsel pay half of the reasonable attorney’s fees that the hospital incurred in connection with the extension. Banks v. Jackson Hosp. & Clinic, Inc., 2012 WL 566561, *1 (M.D. Ala. Feb. 21, 2012). Banks’s counsel agreed and the case is now before the court on the hospital’s motion for fees. For the reasons that follow, that motion will be granted. As a condition of granting Banks’s motion to extend, this court required her counsel to agree, in writing, to pay 50 % “of the reasonable attorney’s fees and expenses that defendant Jackson Hospital & Clinic, Inc. ... incurred in connection with the extension motion.” Id. On February 23, her counsel entered a notice indicating that he “respectfully accept[ed] the conditions set forth in [that order].” hospital then expenses. court is Notice (Doc. No. 33) at 1. submitted evidence of its fees The and Therefore, the only question now before the whether the fees and expenses sought are reasonable. The hospital submits a total of $ 407.50 in fees and no expenses attributable to the motion to extend. The fee amount constitutes a little more than two hours of work at attorney billing rates between $ 130 and $ 185 per hour. Banks’s counsel has raised no objection either 2 to the number of hours worked or to the applicable billing rates and the court, based on “its own knowledge and experience concerning reasonable and proper fees,” Norman v. Hous. Auth. of Montgomery, 836 F.2d 1292, 1303 (11th Cir. 1988), concludes that $ 407.50 is appropriate under the circumstances. Therefore, pursuant to this court’s previous order, Banks’s counsel must pay to the hospital 50 % (or $ 203.75) of that amount. *** It is therefore the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Defendant Jackson Hospital & Clinic, Inc.’s motion for fees (doc. no. 38) is granted. (2) Defendant Jackson Hospital & Clinic, Inc. is entitled to $ 203.75 in fees. (3) The above-referenced fees must be paid, within 14 days, by plaintiff Viola H. Banks’s counsel and are not to be born by the plaintiff Banks herself. DONE, this the 8th day of May, 2012. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?