Echols v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE2)

Filing 7

ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that: 1) The petitioner's 5 Objections to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are overruled; 2) The 4 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted; 3) The petition for habeas corpus relief is DENIED and this case is DISMISSED in accordance with the provisions of 28 USC § 2244(b)(3)(A); 4) Costs are taxed against the petitioner. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 9/13/2011. (wcl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
D C ECHOLS, AIS #165602,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Petitioner,
v.
STATE OF ALABAMA, et al.,
Respondents.

CIVIL ACT. NO. 2:11CV484-MEF

ORDER
After an independent review of the file, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and
DECREE of the court that:
1. The petitioner’s objections (Doc. #5) to the Recommendation of the Magistrate
Judge filed on July 15, 2011 are overruled;
2. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #4) entered on July 11,
2011 is adopted;
3. The petition for habeas corpus relief is DENIED and this case is DISMISSED
in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A);
4. Costs are taxed against the petitioner.
th

DONE this the 13 day of September, 2011.
/s/ Mark E. Fuller
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE