McIntyre v. Kane, et al (INMATE 3)

Filing 13

ORDER directing that, the court having considered Petitioner's 12 Reply to Respondent's answer, it is ORDERED that on or before August 25, 2011, Respondent shall file a supplemental answer addressing Petitioner's contention that the Bureau of Prisons has failed to provide Petitioner with a copy of the final Discipline Hearing Officer Report in his case, as further set out. Signed by Honorable Judge Susan Russ Walker on 8/11/11. (scn, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION FREDRICK MCINTYRE, Petitioner, v. THOMAS KANE, et al., Respondents. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 2:11cv530-WHA (WO) ORDER The court having considered Petitioner’s reply to Respondent’s answer (Doc. No. 12), it is ORDERED that on or before August 25, 2011, Respondent shall file a supplemental answer addressing Petitioner’s contention that the Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) has failed to provide Petitioner with a copy of the final Discipline Hearing Officer (“DHO”) Report in his case. In addition, Respondent’s supplemental answer shall address Petitioner’s contention that the BOP has prevented him from pursuing his administrative remedies by failing to provide him with a copy of the final DHO Report. Respondent’s supplemental answer should also make reference to any applicable administrative rules, regulations or guidelines that relate to the timeline for providing an inmate with a copy of the final DHO Report. Done this 11th day of August, 2011. /s/Susan Russ Walker SUSAN RUSS WALKER CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?