Scott v. Lowndes County et al

Filing 33

ORDER directing that all claims against the defendants Charlie (Chip) Williams and Lenny Lee are DISMISSED without prejudice, pursuant to Rule 4(m), FRCP; further ORDERING that this case is DISMISSED, costs taxed to the plaintiff. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 2/24/12. (djy, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION AL KENNETH SCOTT, Plaintiff, v. LOWNDES COUNTY, ALABAMA, CHARLIE (CHIP) WILLIAMS, DERRICK MAULL, and LENNY LEE, Defendants. ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:11cv586-WHA ) ) (wo) ) ) ) ) ORDER By order of this court entered on October 27, 2011 (Doc. #22), the Plaintiff was directed to perfect service on all defendants no later than November 18, 2011, and advised that claims against any defendant not served by then would be dismissed pursuant to Rule 4(m), Fed.R.Civ.P. According to the records of this court, the Defendants Charlie (Chip) Williams and Lenny Lee have not been served as of this date. Accordingly, and pursuant to the previous order of the court (Doc. #22), it is hereby ORDERED that all claims against the Defendants Charlie (Chip) Williams and Lenny Lee are DISMISSED without prejudice, pursuant to Rule 4(m), Fed.R.Civ.P. All claims against the other two named Defendants in this case, Lowndes County, Alabama, and Derrick Maull now also having been dismissed, it is FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED, costs taxed to the Plaintiff. DONE this 24th day of February, 2012. /s/ W. Harold Albritton W. HAROLD ALBRITTON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?