Waldrep v. Albright (INMATE 1)

Filing 43

ORDER OVERRULING plf's 40 Objection to Report and Recommendation; adopting 39 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge; ORDERING as follows: (1) def's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; (2) this case is DISMISSED with prejudice, with no costs to be taxed. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 9/19/14. (djy, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FORTHE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION

ESTHER NICOLE WALDREP, #254835,
Plaintiff,
vs.
FRANK ALBRIGHT,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. 2:11-cv-622-WHA
(WO)

ORDER
On August 25, 2014, the Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (Doc. #39) that the
Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment be granted and this case dismissed with prejudice.
On September 9, 2014, the Plaintiff filed a document (Doc. #40), which has been docketed as an
objection. In that document, however, the Plaintiff states that, because she does not have the
funds to hire an attorney, she will agree to dismiss the case. In spite of that, however, the court
will treat the document as an objection.
And now, after conducting in independent evaluation and de novo review of the case, the
court finds any objection to be without merit, and it is hereby OVERRULED. The court
ADOPTS the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.
2. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice, with no costs to be taxed.

DONE this 19th day of September, 2014.

/s/ W. Harold Albritton
W. HAROLD ALBRITTON
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE