Waldrep v. Albright (INMATE 1)

Filing 43

ORDER OVERRULING plf's 40 Objection to Report and Recommendation; adopting 39 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge; ORDERING as follows: (1) def's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; (2) this case is DISMISSED with prejudice, with no costs to be taxed. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 9/19/14. (djy, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FORTHE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION ESTHER NICOLE WALDREP, #254835, Plaintiff, vs. FRANK ALBRIGHT, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:11-cv-622-WHA (WO) ORDER On August 25, 2014, the Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (Doc. #39) that the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment be granted and this case dismissed with prejudice. On September 9, 2014, the Plaintiff filed a document (Doc. #40), which has been docketed as an objection. In that document, however, the Plaintiff states that, because she does not have the funds to hire an attorney, she will agree to dismiss the case. In spite of that, however, the court will treat the document as an objection. And now, after conducting in independent evaluation and de novo review of the case, the court finds any objection to be without merit, and it is hereby OVERRULED. The court ADOPTS the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. 2. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice, with no costs to be taxed. DONE this 19th day of September, 2014. /s/ W. Harold Albritton W. HAROLD ALBRITTON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?