McAteer v. Daniels, et al (INMATE 1)

Filing 13

ORDER directing that the 8 Objection is DENIED, and the 6 Recommendation is ADOPTED as follows: (1.) The motion for preliminary injunction filed by Plaintiff is DENIED, and (2.) The case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for additional proceedings. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 8/24/11. (scn, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION ROY LEE McATEER, AIS # 147346, Plaintiff, v. LEE POSEY DANIELS, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:11-CV-0630-WKW ORDER On August 9, 2011, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case (Doc. # 6), to which Plaintiff McAteer timely objected (Doc. # 8). The court has conducted a de novo review of those portions of the Recommendation to which objection is made. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The Magistrate Judge recommended that Plaintiff McAteer’s motion for preliminary injunction be denied for failure to bear his burden on the first three of the four requisite elements for issuance of a preliminary objection. (Doc. # 6, at 3.) Plaintiff McAteer objected, arguing that this finding was premature because no discovery has been conducted in this matter. (Doc. # 8, at 1-2.) Plaintiff bears the burden to demonstrate the existence of each of the prerequisites for issuance of a preliminary injunction, and he has failed to carry that burden. Scott v. Roberts, 612 F.3d 1279, 1290 (11th Cir. 2010). The Objection also failed to show good cause why expedited discovery should be conducted in this case. See, e.g., Qwest Commc’ns Intern., Inc. v. WorldQuest Networks, Inc., 213 F.R.D. 418, 419 (D. Colo. 2003) (listing cases). Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Objection is DENIED, and the Recommendation is ADOPTED as follows: 1. The motion for preliminary injunction filed by Plaintiff is DENIED, and 2. The case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for additional proceedings. DONE this 24th day of August, 2011. /s/ W. Keith Watkins CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?