Mays v. Baker et al (INMATE1)(CONSENT)

Filing 13

ORDER that the objection is overruled as moot, the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1)Plf's claims against the State of Alabama are DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to the provisions of 28 USC § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i and iii), and the State of Alabama is DISMISSED as a Dft in this case; 2) With respect to the allegations set forth against Marianne Baker, D.Diaz and Correctional Medical Services, Inc., this case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 9/12/2011. (wcl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION CALVIN MAYS, JR., AIS #150299, Plaintiff, vs. MARIANNE BAKER, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:11cv694-WHA ORDER This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #9), entered on September 2, 2011. On September 9, 2011, the Plaintiff filed a document (Doc. #11) in which he objected to the Recommendation. The basis for the objection, however, was actually resolved by the Recommendation itself, as noted by the order of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #12), entered on September 12, 2011. Therefore, the objection is overruled as moot, the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Plaintiff’s claims against the State of Alabama are DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i and iii), and the State of Alabama is DISMISSED as a Defendant in this case. 2. With respect to the allegations set forth against Marianne Baker, D.Diaz and Correctional Medical Services, Inc., this case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. DONE this 12th day of September, 2011. /s/ W. Harold Albritton W. HAROLD ALBRITTON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?