Mays v. Baker et al (INMATE1)(CONSENT)
Filing
13
ORDER that the objection is overruled as moot, the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1)Plf's claims against the State of Alabama are DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to the provisions of 28 USC § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i and iii), and the State of Alabama is DISMISSED as a Dft in this case; 2) With respect to the allegations set forth against Marianne Baker, D.Diaz and Correctional Medical Services, Inc., this case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 9/12/2011. (wcl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
CALVIN MAYS, JR., AIS #150299,
Plaintiff,
vs.
MARIANNE BAKER, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:11cv694-WHA
ORDER
This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #9),
entered on September 2, 2011.
On September 9, 2011, the Plaintiff filed a document (Doc. #11) in which he objected to
the Recommendation. The basis for the objection, however, was actually resolved by the
Recommendation itself, as noted by the order of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #12), entered on
September 12, 2011. Therefore, the objection is overruled as moot, the Recommendation of the
Magistrate Judge is adopted, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. Plaintiff’s claims against the State of Alabama are DISMISSED with prejudice
pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i and iii), and the State of Alabama is
DISMISSED as a Defendant in this case.
2. With respect to the allegations set forth against Marianne Baker, D.Diaz and
Correctional Medical Services, Inc., this case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further
proceedings.
DONE this 12th day of September, 2011.
/s/ W. Harold Albritton
W. HAROLD ALBRITTON
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?