Driskell v. Jones et al (INMATE 1)
ORDER as follows: 1. Plaintiff's 76 Objections are OVERRULED; 2. The 75 Recommendation is ADOPTED; 3. Defendants' 13 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; and 4. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. A separate final judgment will be entered. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 9/25/2014. (dmn, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
CARROL JOE DRISKELL,
KENNETH JONES, et al.,
CASE NO. 2:11-CV-721-WKW
On August 22, 2014, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this
case. (Doc. # 75.) On September 9, 2014, Plaintiff filed objections. (Doc. # 76.)
The court has conducted an independent and de novo review of those portions of
the Recommendation to which objection is made. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b).
Upon consideration of the Recommendation and Plaintiff’s objections, it is
ORDERED as follows:
Plaintiff’s objections (Doc. # 76) are OVERRULED;
The Recommendation (Doc. # 75) is ADOPTED;
Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. # 13) is
This case is DIMISSED with prejudice.
A separate final judgment will be entered.
DONE this 25th day of September, 2014.
/s/ W. Keith Watkins
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?