Dence v. Oaks et al (INMATE 2)
Filing
10
ORDER as follows: 1. That the 5 Recommendation be and is hereby ADOPTED. 2. That the plaintiff's claims against the Chilton County Jail and Southern Health Partners be and are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process pursuan t to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii). 3. That the Chilton County Jail and Southern Health Partners be and are hereby DISMISSED as parties in this cause of action. 4. That this case, with respect to the plaintiff's claims against the remaining defendant, be and is hereby REFERRED BACK to the Magistrate Judge for appropriate proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 10/17/2011. (jg, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
MICHAEL ALAN DENCE,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
v.
MARLOWE OAKS, et al.,
Defendants.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:11cv727-TMH
(WO)
ORDER
On September 8, 2011, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which
no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file in this case and
upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is
ORDERED as follows:
1.
That the Recommendation be and is hereby ADOPTED.
2.
That the plaintiff’s claims against the Chilton County Jail and Southern Health
Partners be and are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to the
provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii).
3.
That the Chilton County Jail and Southern Health Partners be and are hereby
DISMISSED as parties in this cause of action.
4.
That this case, with respect to the plaintiff’s claims against the remaining
defendant, be and is hereby REFERRED BACK to the Magistrate Judge for appropriate
proceedings.
Done this the 17th day of October 2011.
/s/ Truman M. Hobbs
________________________________________
TRUMAN M. HOBBS
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?