Jordan v. Holt et al (INMATE 1)

Filing 6

ORDER overruling plaintiff's 5 Objection; adopting 4 Report and Recommendations; dismissing this case without prejudice prior to service of process in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 11/29/2011. (cc, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION JAMES T. JORDAN, #124614, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, vs. KATHY HOLT, et al., Defendants. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:11cv846-WHA (WO) ORDER Upon an independent evaluation and de novo review of this matter, including the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #4), and the Objection (Doc. #5) of the Plaintiff, the court finds the objection to be without merit, and it is hereby OVERRULED. The court ADOPTS the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and it is hereby ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice prior to service of process in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). DONE this 29th day of November, 2011. /s/ W. Harold Albritton W. HAROLD ALBRITTON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?