Jordan v. Holt et al (INMATE 1)
ORDER overruling plaintiff's 5 Objection; adopting 4 Report and Recommendations; dismissing this case without prejudice prior to service of process in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 11/29/2011. (cc, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
JAMES T. JORDAN, #124614,
KATHY HOLT, et al.,
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:11cv846-WHA
Upon an independent evaluation and de novo review of this matter, including the
Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #4), and the Objection (Doc. #5) of the Plaintiff,
the court finds the objection to be without merit, and it is hereby OVERRULED. The court
ADOPTS the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and it is hereby
ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice prior to service of process in
accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).
DONE this 29th day of November, 2011.
/s/ W. Harold Albritton
W. HAROLD ALBRITTON
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?