Couch v. Marshall et al(MAG+)
Filing
33
ORDER directing that, after an independent and de novo review of the record, it is ORDERED as follows: (1) The magistrate judge's 25 recommendation, to which no objection has been filed, is adopted; (2) The 11 motion to dismiss is denied. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 3/6/12. (scn, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
KIMBERLY MONIQUE COUCH,
Plaintiff,
v.
SHERIFF D.T. MARSHALL and
OFFICER DANTE´JOHNSON,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:11cv950-MHT
ORDER
After an independent and de novo review of the record,
it is ORDERED as follows:
(1) The magistrate judge’s recommendation (doc. no.
25), to which no objection has been filed, is
adopted.
(2) The motion to dismiss (doc. no. 11) is denied.
This cause is referred back to the United States
Magistrate Judge for further appropriate proceedings.
DONE, this the 6th day of March, 2012.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?