Couch v. Marshall et al(MAG+)

Filing 33

ORDER directing that, after an independent and de novo review of the record, it is ORDERED as follows: (1) The magistrate judge's 25 recommendation, to which no objection has been filed, is adopted; (2) The 11 motion to dismiss is denied. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 3/6/12. (scn, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION KIMBERLY MONIQUE COUCH, Plaintiff, v. SHERIFF D.T. MARSHALL and OFFICER DANTE´JOHNSON, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:11cv950-MHT ORDER After an independent and de novo review of the record, it is ORDERED as follows: (1) The magistrate judge’s recommendation (doc. no. 25), to which no objection has been filed, is adopted. (2) The motion to dismiss (doc. no. 11) is denied. This cause is referred back to the United States Magistrate Judge for further appropriate proceedings. DONE, this the 6th day of March, 2012. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?