Couch v. Marshall et al(MAG+)
Filing
34
ORDER directing that, after an independent and de novo review of the record, it is ORDERED as follows: (1) The magistrate judge's 26 recommendation, to which no objection has been filed, is adopted; (2) The 8 motion to dismiss and alternative motion for more definite statement are denied. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 3/6/12. (scn, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
KIMBERLY MONIQUE COUCH,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
v.
SHERIFF D.T. MARSHALL and
OFFICER DANTE´JOHNSON,
Defendant.
CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:11cv950-MHT
ORDER
After
an
independent
and
de
novo
review
of
the
record, it is ORDERED as follows:
(1) The magistrate judge’s recommendation (doc. no.
26), to which no objection has been filed, is adopted.
(2) The motion to dismiss and alternative motion for
more definite statement (doc. no. 8) are denied.
This cause is referred back to the United States
Magistrate Judge for further appropriate proceedings.
DONE, this the 6th day of March, 2012.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?