Denson v. Peasant et al (INMATE 2)

Filing 13

ORDER AND OPINION that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge beand is hereby ADOPTED and that: 1. The motion to dismiss filed by defendants 10 is GRANTED to the extent defendants seek dismissal of this case due to plaintiff's failure to p roperly exhaust an administrative remedy available to him at the Ventress Correctional Facility. 2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to the provisions of 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) for plaintiff's failure to exhaust an administrative remedy available to himat the Ventress Correctional Facility. Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 3/14/2012. (jg, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION LEONARD DENSON, #262564, Plaintiff, v. DR. PEASANT, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:11cv983-TMH ORDER AND OPINION On February 23, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 12). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED and that: 1. The motion to dismiss filed by defendants (Doc. # 10) is GRANTED to the extent defendants seek dismissal of this case due to plaintiff’s failure to properly exhaust an administrative remedy available to him at the Ventress Correctional Facility. 2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to the provisions of 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) for plaintiff’s failure to exhaust an administrative remedy available to him at the Ventress Correctional Facility. Done this the 14 th day of March, 2012. /s/ Truman M. Hobbs ________________________________________ SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?