ALFA Mutual Insurance Company v. Informatica Corporation

Filing 6

CONSENT ORDER that: A. The parties have agreed to maintain the status quo regarding, and not to cause any interruption to, (1) any and all licensing agreements between plaintiff Alfa Mutual Insurance Company and defendant Informatica Corporation and (2) any and all business intelligence gathering abilities in effect at plaintiff Alfa Mutual Insurance Company made possible by the licensing agreements between the parties, pending further orders ofthe court; B. The petition for temporary restrainin g order andmotion for preliminary injunction 1 are denied as moot; C. Either party may move for further and/or different relief by filing proper pleadings in thiscourt; and D. An on-the-record status conference in this cause is set for February 3, 2012, at 2:30 p.m. Counsel for the parties are to arrange for the conference to be conducted by telephone. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 12/6/2011. (jg, )

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

ALFA MUTUAL INSURANCE
COMPANY,
Plaintiff,
v.
INFORMATICA CORPORATION,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:11cv1023-MHT
(WO)

CONSENT ORDER
Plaintiff Alfa Mutual Insurance Company brought this
declaratory-judgment action against defendant Informatica
Corporation seeking, among other things, a temporary
restraining order and a preliminary injunction.
parties

have

reached

a

joint

and

mutual

regarding the issues raised in the complaint.

The

agreement
The court,

having determined that jurisdiction exists and that the
parties’ agreement should be given effect, it is the
ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE that:
A.

The parties have agreed to maintain the status

quo regarding, and not to cause any interruption to, (1)

any and all licensing agreements between plaintiff Alfa
Mutual

Insurance

Company

and

defendant

Informatica

Corporation and (2) any and all business intelligence
gathering abilities in effect at plaintiff Alfa Mutual
Insurance

Company

made

possible

by

the

licensing

agreements between the parties, pending further orders of
the court;
B.

The petition for temporary restraining order and

motion for preliminary injunction (doc. no. 1) are denied
as moot;
C.

Either

different

relief

party

may

by

filing

move

for

proper

further

pleadings

and/or
in

this

court; and
D.

An on-the-record status conference in this cause

is set for February 3, 2012, at 2:30 p.m.

Counsel for

the parties are to arrange for the conference to be
conducted by telephone.
DONE, this the 6th day of December, 2011.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE