Beauchamp et al v. Wallace et al

Filing 184

ORDER directing that the 129 motion to dismiss is denied in part and granted in part, as further set out. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 10/11/13. (scn, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION D’LIVRO BEAUCHAMP and OBELISK HEALTHCARE, LLC, Plaintiffs, v. MIKE WALLACE, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:11cv1029-MHT (WO) ORDER Based on the representations made during the on-therecord conference call held June 4, 2013, it is ORDERED that the motion to dismiss filed by defendant De Lage Landen Financial Services, Inc. (doc. no. 129), is denied in part and granted in part as follows: (1) The motion to dismiss filed by defendant De Lage Landen Financial Services, Inc. (doc. no. 129), is denied to the extent that the defendant seeks dismissal of the complaint on the basis of improper service. Defendant De Lage Landen Financial Services, Inc., has been served, has notice of the lawsuit, and was named as a defendant in this case by substitution. (2) The motion to dismiss filed by defendant De Lage Landen Financial Services, Inc. (doc. no. 129) is granted to the extent that the claim under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692, is dismissed. (3) The motion to dismiss filed by defendant De Lage Landen Financial Services, Inc. (doc. no. 129) is granted to the extent that the allegation of fraud is dismissed with leave to amend the complaint in compliance with the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 9(b). (4) The motion to dismiss filed by defendant De Lage Landen Financial Services, Inc. (doc. no. 129) is otherwise denied with leave to renew following amendment of the complaint. DONE, this the 11th day of October, 2013. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?