Beauchamp et al v. Wallace et al
Filing
184
ORDER directing that the 129 motion to dismiss is denied in part and granted in part, as further set out. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 10/11/13. (scn, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
D’LIVRO BEAUCHAMP and
OBELISK HEALTHCARE, LLC,
Plaintiffs,
v.
MIKE WALLACE, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:11cv1029-MHT
(WO)
ORDER
Based on the representations made during the on-therecord conference call held June 4, 2013, it is ORDERED
that the motion to dismiss filed by defendant De Lage
Landen Financial Services, Inc. (doc. no. 129), is denied
in part and granted in part as follows:
(1) The motion to dismiss filed by defendant De Lage
Landen Financial Services, Inc. (doc. no. 129), is denied
to the extent that the defendant seeks dismissal of the
complaint on the basis of improper service.
Defendant De
Lage Landen Financial Services, Inc., has been served,
has notice of the lawsuit, and was named as a defendant
in this case by substitution.
(2) The motion to dismiss filed by defendant De Lage
Landen Financial Services, Inc. (doc. no. 129) is granted
to
the
extent
that
the
claim
under
the
Fair
Debt
Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692, is dismissed.
(3) The motion to dismiss filed by defendant De Lage
Landen Financial Services, Inc. (doc. no. 129) is granted
to the extent that the allegation of fraud is dismissed
with leave to amend the complaint in compliance with the
requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 9(b).
(4) The motion to dismiss filed by defendant De Lage
Landen
Financial
Services,
Inc.
(doc.
no.
129)
is
otherwise denied with leave to renew following amendment
of the complaint.
DONE, this the 11th day of October, 2013.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?