Mitchell v. Rouse, et al (INMATE 1)

Filing 24

ORDER directing that, after an independent review of the Magistrate Judge's 22 order and the plaintiff's 23 objection, the Court finds that the Magistrate Judge's order is neither clearly erroneous, nor contrary to law. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a). Therefore, it is hereby ORDERED that plaintiff's objection is OVERRULED. It is further ORDERED that this case is REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge for appropriate action. Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 4/30/12. (scn, )

IN THE UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
JERMAINE MITCHELL, #205893,
Plaintiff,
v.
SCOTT ROUSE, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. 2:11-cv-1101-TMH
WO

ORDER
This cause is before the Court on the plaintiff's Objection to Magistrate's Order (Doc.
#23) filed on April 25, 2012. Specifically, plaintiff objects to the Magistrate Judge's order
of April 17, 2012 (Doc. #22) directing the plaintiff to file a response to the defendants'
special report. After an independent review of the Magistrate Judge's order and the plaintiff's
objection, the Court finds that the Magistrate Judge’s order is neither clearly erroneous, nor
contrary to law. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a). Therefore, it is hereby
ORDERED that plaintiff's objection (Doc. #23) is OVERRULED. It is further
ORDERED that this case is REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge for appropriate action.
DONE this the 30th day of April, 2012.
/s/ Truman M. Hobbs

TRUMAN M. HOBBS
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE