Mitchell v. Rouse, et al (INMATE 1)

Filing 40

ORDER AND OPINION: It is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the 39 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED and that: 1. The defendants motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. 2. Judgment is GRANTED in favor of the defendants. 3. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. 4. The costs of this proceeding are taxed against the plaintiff. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 3/2/2015. (dmn, )

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
JERMAINE MITCHELL, #205893,
Plaintiff,
v.
SCOTT ROUSE, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:11cv1101-WHA

ORDER AND OPINION
On February 9, 2015, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to
which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 39). Upon an independent review of
the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge,
it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be
and is hereby ADOPTED and that:
1.

The defendants’ motion for summary judgment is GRANTED.

2.

Judgment is GRANTED in favor of the defendants.

3.

This case is DISMISSED with prejudice.

4.

The costs of this proceeding are taxed against the plaintiff.

Done this the 2nd day of March, 2015.

/s/ W. Harold Albritton
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE