The Colonial BancGroup, Inc. et al v. Branch Banking and Trust Company
Filing
5
ORDER that defendant Branch Banking and Trust Company's 1 MOTION for withdrawal of the reference is granted; that the clerks of the bankruptcy court and this court are DIRECTED to take all steps necessary to transfer to the USDC for the Middle District of Alabama the adversary proceeding initiated by Colonial BancGroup on April 8, 2011 (bankruptcy case no. 09-32303 (Chapter 11) and bankruptcy adversary proceeding no. 11-03026, M.D. Ala); that the clerk of this court shall set up the trans ferred case as a separate civil case, with a separate and new civil action number; that based on the potential conservation of resources and with the parties consent, this court has therefore, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(d), withdrawn the refere nce of the adversary proceeding from the bankruptcy court to this court for all purposes; that all other matters in bankruptcy case no. 09-32303-DHW (M.D. Ala.) shall remain under the jurisdiction of the bankruptcy court. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 9/29/2011. (cc, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
IN RE:
COLONIAL BANCGROUP, INC.,
Debtor.
COLONIAL BANCGROUP, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST
COMPANY,
Defendant.
)
)
)
BANKRUPTCY CASE NO.
)
09-32303-DHW
)
)
) DISTRICT COURT MISC. NO.
)
2:11mc3580-MHT
)
(Bankr. Adv. Proc.
)
No. 11-03026)
)
(WO)
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER
This matter is before the court on a motion, filed by
defendant Branch Banking and Trust Company (“BB&T”), to
withdraw the bankruptcy reference and transfer adversary
proceeding number 11-03026 to the district court.
Based
on the representations that the parties made during a
telephone conference on September 28, 2011, and for the
reasons stated below, it is ORDERED that defendant Branch
Banking and Trust Company’s motion for withdrawal of the
reference (doc. no. 1) is granted.
The clerks of the bankruptcy court and this court are
DIRECTED to take all steps necessary to transfer to the
United States District Court for the Middle District of
Alabama the adversary proceeding initiated by Colonial
BancGroup on April 8, 2011 (bankruptcy case no. 09-32303
(Chapter 11) and bankruptcy adversary proceeding no. 1103026, M.D. Ala).
The clerk of this court shall set up
the transferred case as a separate civil case, with a
separate and new civil action number.
* * *
A
“district
court
may
withdraw
...
any
case
or
proceeding ... on timely motion of any party, for cause
shown.”
28 U.S.C. § 157(d).
Determining whether cause
exists involves analyzing a number of factors, including
whether withdrawal will prevent forum shopping, conserve
the parties’ resources, and facilitate the bankruptcy
process.
See In re Simmons, 200 F.3d 738, 741-42 (11th
Cir. 2000).
2
During a telephone conference held subsequent to
BB&T’s filing of the motion, Colonial BancGroup consented
to
withdrawal
of
the
reference.
Colonial
BancGroup
explained that it would be more efficient to withdraw the
reference because nearly identical issues to those raised
in the adversary proceeding are currently pending before
this court in a civil action between Colonial BancGroup
and
the
Federal
Deposit
Insurance
Corporation.
Withdrawal of the reference would therefore make the
parallel, overlapping litigation taking place in the
bankruptcy
court
unnecessary,
thereby
conserving
the
parties’ resources and streamlining the resolution of
this dispute.
Based on the potential conservation of resources and
with
the
parties
consent,
this
court
has
therefore,
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(d), withdrawn the reference
of the adversary proceeding from the bankruptcy court to
this
court
for
all
purposes.
3
All
other
matters
in
bankruptcy case no. 09-32303-DHW (M.D. Ala.) shall remain
under the jurisdiction of the bankruptcy court.
DONE, this 29th day of September, 2011.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?