Davis v. Giles et al (INMATE 1)

Filing 5

ORDER that 1. The Recommendation 4 of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; 2. Petitioner's 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for habeas corpus relief is DENIED; and 3. This cause of action is DISMISSED in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A). A separate judgment shall issue. Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 2/27/2012. (jg, )

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
PERRY LANE DAVIS, #226416,
Petitioner,
v.
J. C. GILES, et al.,
Respondents.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. 2:12-cv-13-TMH

ORDER
The Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (Doc. #4) in this case to which no
timely objections have been filed. After a review of the Recommendation, and after an
independent review of the entire record, the court finds that the Recommendation should be
adopted. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that
1. The Recommendation (Doc. #4) of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED;
2. Petitioner’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for habeas corpus relief is DENIED; and
3. This cause of action is DISMISSED in accordance with the provisions of 28
U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A).
A separate judgment shall issue.
Done this 27 th day of February, 2012.
/s/ Truman M. Hobbs
_______________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE