Differ v. Smith (INMATE 2)

Filing 50

ORDER ADOPTING 46 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Mag Judge; ORDERING that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice, as further set out in order. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 8/29/13. (djy, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION

DENNIS DIFFER, #236916,
Plaintiff,
v.
M. SMITH,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:12cv065-WHA
(WO)

ORDER
On July 8, 2013, the Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (Doc. #46) that this
case be dismissed without prejudice. On August 5, 2013, the Plaintiff filed, by mailing through
the prison mail, a document (Doc. #49) entitled “ExParte Response to Magistrate Judge’s
Recommendation.” In this Response, the Plaintiff agreed with the Recommendation of a
dismissal without prejudice. Therefore, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby
ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice.

Plaintiff’s Response also, however, contained the following request:
Plaintiff would like this Court’s Senior Judge to grant him the opportunity to
submit a motion/petition before this court dealing with the doctrines of
“CONTINUING TORT THEORY” or “Continuing Violation Doctrine” involving
tolling the Statute of limitations also relevant to conspiracy and coverup. Plaintiff
requests this Court to grant him the opportunity to construct and (given sufficient
time) to submit such to maintain his rights to relief from the continuous/ongoing
deprivations and violations ADOC officials are subjecting him to.”

This request is outside the scope of this suit which is being dismissed without prejudice, and is
not appropriate for the court to consider. Therefore, it is ORDERED that this request is
DENIED.

Final Judgment will be entered.
DONE this 29th day of August, 2013.

/s/ W. Harold Albritton
W. HAROLD ALBRITTON
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE