Kennedy v. United States of America (INMATE 3)

Filing 10

ORDER the court finds the 8 , 9 objections to be without merit, and they are hereby OVERRULED. The court ADOPTS the 7 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and it is hereby ORDERED that the Petitioner's § 2255 motion is DENIED, and this case is DISMISSED for failure to obtain the requisite order from the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals authorizing this court to consider a successive § 2255 motion. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 9/19/2012. (jg, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION JOSEPH KENNEDY, Petitioner, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:12cv073-WHA (WO) ORDER This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #7), entered on July 5, 2012, the Objections (Doc. #8) filed by Petitioner on July 23, 2012, and a second Objection (Doc. #9), filed by the Petitioner on August 24, 2012. After an independent evaluation and de novo review of this case, the court agrees with the Recommendation that this § 2255 motion should be denied for the reason that the Petitioner has failed to obtain the requisite order from the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals authorizing this court to consider a successive § 2255 motion. Therefore, the court finds the objections to be without merit, and they are hereby OVERRULED. The court ADOPTS the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and it is hereby ORDERED that the Petitioner’s § 2255 motion is DENIED, and this case is DISMISSED for failure to obtain the requisite order from the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals authorizing this court to consider a successive § 2255 motion. DONE this 19th day of September, 2012. /s/ W. Harold Albritton W. HAROLD ALBRITTON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?