Godwin et al v. Kelley et al

Filing 109

ORDER directing that the Plaintiffs' Objections (Doc. # 96 ) are STRICKEN, as further set out. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 10/16/13. (scn, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION BYRON GODWIN and CHARLES NELSON, Plaintiffs, DOUG BURKHALTER and THE CITY OF MILLBROOK, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:12cv164-WHA (wo) ORDER This cause is before the court on the Plaintiffs’ Objections to Defendants’ Exhibit List (Doc. #96). The Objections merely state that the Plaintiffs reserve objections to exhibits the Defendants introduce based on the Federal Rules of Evidence, and do not waive objections. The Uniform Scheduling Order, however, requires the Plaintiffs to set forth grounds and legal authorities for objections to the Defendants’ Exhibit Lists. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Plaintiffs’ Objections (Doc. #96) are STRICKEN. The Plaintiffs are given until October 18, 2013 to file new objections which refer to the specific exhibits on Defendants’ Exhibit List by exhibit number, and which set forth grounds and legal authorities for the objections. The Defendants are given until October 23, 2013 to file a written response to the objections, and to include a premarked copy of the evidence at issue. Done this 16th day of October, 2013. /s/ W. Harold Albritton W. HAROLD ALBRITTON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?