Godwin et al v. Kelley et al
Filing
109
ORDER directing that the Plaintiffs' Objections (Doc. # 96 ) are STRICKEN, as further set out. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 10/16/13. (scn, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
BYRON GODWIN and CHARLES
NELSON,
Plaintiffs,
DOUG BURKHALTER and THE CITY
OF MILLBROOK,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 2:12cv164-WHA
(wo)
ORDER
This cause is before the court on the Plaintiffs’ Objections to Defendants’ Exhibit List
(Doc. #96). The Objections merely state that the Plaintiffs reserve objections to exhibits the
Defendants introduce based on the Federal Rules of Evidence, and do not waive objections. The
Uniform Scheduling Order, however, requires the Plaintiffs to set forth grounds and legal
authorities for objections to the Defendants’ Exhibit Lists. Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED that the Plaintiffs’ Objections (Doc. #96) are STRICKEN. The Plaintiffs are
given until October 18, 2013 to file new objections which refer to the specific exhibits on
Defendants’ Exhibit List by exhibit number, and which set forth grounds and legal authorities for
the objections.
The Defendants are given until October 23, 2013 to file a written response to the
objections, and to include a premarked copy of the evidence at issue.
Done this 16th day of October, 2013.
/s/ W. Harold Albritton
W. HAROLD ALBRITTON
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?