Murphy v. Giles et al (INMATE 2)

Filing 39

ORDERED that: 1) The 33 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; 2) Plf's 38 Objection is OVERRULED; 3) Plf's 1 Motion for Preliminary Injunction on his inadequate medical care and unsafe work conditions claims is DENIED; 4) Plf's 3 Motion for Permanent Injunction on the unsafe work conditions claim is DENIED; and 5) This case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 7/18/2012. (wcl, )

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
JIMMY HARDEN MURPHY, # 162386
Plaintiff,
v.
SANDRA GILES, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. 2:12-cv-224-MEF

ORDER
On June 18, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. # 33) in this
case, to which Plaintiff has filed an Objection (Doc. # 38). After an independent review of
the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge,
it is ORDERED that:
1.

The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 33) is ADOPTED;

2.

Plaintiff’s Objection (Doc. # 38) is OVERRULED;

3.

Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction on his inadequate medical care
and unsafe work conditions claims (Doc # 1) is DENIED;

4.

Plaintiff’s motion for permanent injunction on the unsafe work conditions
claim (Doc. # 3) is DENIED; and

5.

This case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.

DONE this 18th day of July, 2012.
/s/ Mark E. Fuller
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE