Murphy v. Giles et al (INMATE 2)
Filing
39
ORDERED that: 1) The 33 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; 2) Plf's 38 Objection is OVERRULED; 3) Plf's 1 Motion for Preliminary Injunction on his inadequate medical care and unsafe work conditions claims is DENIED; 4) Plf's 3 Motion for Permanent Injunction on the unsafe work conditions claim is DENIED; and 5) This case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 7/18/2012. (wcl, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
JIMMY HARDEN MURPHY, # 162386
Plaintiff,
v.
SANDRA GILES, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. 2:12-cv-224-MEF
ORDER
On June 18, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. # 33) in this
case, to which Plaintiff has filed an Objection (Doc. # 38). After an independent review of
the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge,
it is ORDERED that:
1.
The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 33) is ADOPTED;
2.
Plaintiff’s Objection (Doc. # 38) is OVERRULED;
3.
Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction on his inadequate medical care
and unsafe work conditions claims (Doc # 1) is DENIED;
4.
Plaintiff’s motion for permanent injunction on the unsafe work conditions
claim (Doc. # 3) is DENIED; and
5.
This case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.
DONE this 18th day of July, 2012.
/s/ Mark E. Fuller
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?