Warren v. Harden et al

Filing 32

ORDER granting 31 Motion for Additional Time to Respond to Order on Dfts' Motion to Dismiss; Plf shall file a response to Dfts' 27 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, which shall include a brief and any evidentiary materials, on or before 6/5/2013; Dfts may file a reply brief on or before 6/12/2013. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 5/22/2013. (wcl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION KATE HAWKINS WARREN, Plaintiff, v. KENNY HARDEN, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:12-cv-228-MEF (WO – Do Not Publish) ORDER Before the Court is Plaintiff’s unopposed Motion for Additional Time to Respond to Order on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #31). It is hereby ORDERED for good cause shown that Plaintiff’s motion (Doc. #31) is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file a response to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Doc. #27), which shall include a brief and any evidentiary materials, on or before June 5, 2013. Defendants may file a reply brief on or before June 12, 2013. DONE this the 22nd day of May, 2013. /s/ Mark E. Fuller UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?