Allah v. Sims et al (INMATE 2)
Filing
59
ORDER adopting the 58 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge;directing as follows: (1) defs' 18 & 56 Motions for Summary Judgment are GRANTED; (2) Judgment is entered in favor of defendants; (3) this case is DISMISSED with prejudice; (4)costs are taxed against the plaintiff; (5) final judgment will be entered accordingly. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 3/24/15. (djy, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
JUSTICE I. ALLAH,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
DR. GURLEY, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
_______________________________________
JUSTICE I. ALLAH,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
vs.
QUALITY CORRECTIONAL
HEALTHCARE, et al.,
Defendants.
CASE NO. 2:12-cv-255-WHA
(WO)
CASE NO. 2:12-cv-915-WHA
(WO)
ORDER
This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #58),
entered on March 2, 2015. There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and
after a review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED as
follows:
1. Defendants’ motions for summary judgment (Docs. #18 and 56) are GRANTED.
2. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants.
3. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice.
4. Costs are taxed against the Plaintiff.
5. Final Judgment will be entered accordingly.
DONE this 24th day of March, 2015.
/s/ W. Harold Albritton
W. HAROLD ALBRITTON
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?