Allah v. Sims et al (INMATE 2)

Filing 59

ORDER adopting the 58 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge;directing as follows: (1) defs' 18 & 56 Motions for Summary Judgment are GRANTED; (2) Judgment is entered in favor of defendants; (3) this case is DISMISSED with prejudice; (4)costs are taxed against the plaintiff; (5) final judgment will be entered accordingly. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 3/24/15. (djy, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION JUSTICE I. ALLAH, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) DR. GURLEY, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) _______________________________________ JUSTICE I. ALLAH, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, vs. QUALITY CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE, et al., Defendants. CASE NO. 2:12-cv-255-WHA (WO) CASE NO. 2:12-cv-915-WHA (WO) ORDER This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #58), entered on March 2, 2015. There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and after a review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Defendants’ motions for summary judgment (Docs. #18 and 56) are GRANTED. 2. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants. 3. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. 4. Costs are taxed against the Plaintiff. 5. Final Judgment will be entered accordingly. DONE this 24th day of March, 2015. /s/ W. Harold Albritton W. HAROLD ALBRITTON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?