Addie v. Alabama Board of Pardons & Paroles et al (INMATE 2)
Filing
10
OPINION and ORDER that the 6 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED, the Plaintiffs claim against the Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles is DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to that the claim of false imprisonment be dismissed pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(I), The Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles is DISMISSED as a part to this cause of action, and the Plaintiff's claims against the remaining defendants is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for additional proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 5/30/2012. (jg, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
DANNY LAMAR ADDIE, #152 701,
Plaintiff,
v.
ALABAMA BOARD OF PARDONS
AND PAROLES, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. 2:12-cv-297-TMH
[wo]
OPINION and ORDER
On May 3, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to
which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. 6) Upon an independent review of the
file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge,
it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge
be and is hereby ADOPTED, the Plaintiff’s claim against the Alabama Board of Pardons
and Paroles is DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to that the
claim of false imprisonment be dismissed pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §
1915(e)(2)(B)(I), The Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles is DISMISSED as a part to
this cause of action, and the Plaintiff’s claims against the remaining defendants is referred
back to the Magistrate Judge for additional proceedings.
DONE this 30th day of May, 2012.
/s/ Truman M. Hobbs
TRUMAN M. HOBBS
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?