Sims v. Carter et al (INMATE 1)

Filing 12

ORDER directing that, upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED and th at: 1. The petition for habeas relief filed by Elbert Sims is DENIED as it was not filed within the one-year period of limitation required by 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1); 2. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 10/22/14. (scn, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION ELBERT SIMS, #217355, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Petitioner, v. BETTINA CARTER, et al., Respondents. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:12cv300-WHA ORDER AND OPINION On October 2, 2014, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 11). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED and that: 1. The petition for habeas relief filed by Elbert Sims is DENIED as it was not filed within the one-year period of limitation required by 28 U.S.C. ยง 2244(d)(1). 2. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. Done this the 22nd day of October, 2014. /s/ W. Harold Albritton SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?