Loucks, et al. v. Shorest, LLC, et al.

Filing 35

ORDER denying as moot 33 Motion for Writ of Attachment; denying as moot 34 Motion for Leave to Supplement the Motion for Writ Attachment. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 3/8/2013. (wcl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION

VALERIE MALISSIA VEAZEY LOUCKS )
and AMANDA VICTORIA WOODHAM, )
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
v.
)
)
SHOREST, LLC, and RHI, INC.
)
d/b/a SHONEY’S OF CLANTON,
)
)
Defendants.
)

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:12cv304-WHA
(WO)

ORDER
On March 1, 2013, the plaintiffs filed a motion for writ of attachment (doc. # 33). On
March 4, 2013, the plaintiffs filed a motion for leave to supplement the motion for writ of
attachment (doc. # 34). The plaintiffs sought to require Steve Walker, an employee of the
defendants, to appear for and submit to, a deposition in this action. On March 7, 2013, the
court was informed that Mr. Walker has submitted to a deposition on this date. Accordingly,
upon consideration of the motions, and for good cause, it is
ORDERED that the motion for writ of attachment (doc. # 33) and the motion for leave
to supplement the motion for writ of attachment (doc. # 34) be and are hereby DENIED as
moot.
Done this 8th day of March, 2013.

/s/Charles S. Coody
CHARLES S. COODY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE