Loucks, et al. v. Shorest, LLC, et al.
ORDER denying as moot 33 Motion for Writ of Attachment; denying as moot 34 Motion for Leave to Supplement the Motion for Writ Attachment. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 3/8/2013. (wcl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
VALERIE MALISSIA VEAZEY LOUCKS )
and AMANDA VICTORIA WOODHAM, )
SHOREST, LLC, and RHI, INC.
d/b/a SHONEY’S OF CLANTON,
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:12cv304-WHA
On March 1, 2013, the plaintiffs filed a motion for writ of attachment (doc. # 33). On
March 4, 2013, the plaintiffs filed a motion for leave to supplement the motion for writ of
attachment (doc. # 34). The plaintiffs sought to require Steve Walker, an employee of the
defendants, to appear for and submit to, a deposition in this action. On March 7, 2013, the
court was informed that Mr. Walker has submitted to a deposition on this date. Accordingly,
upon consideration of the motions, and for good cause, it is
ORDERED that the motion for writ of attachment (doc. # 33) and the motion for leave
to supplement the motion for writ of attachment (doc. # 34) be and are hereby DENIED as
Done this 8th day of March, 2013.
/s/Charles S. Coody
CHARLES S. COODY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?