Loucks, et al. v. Shorest, LLC, et al.

Filing 70

ORDER that the Plfs are given until noon on 5/7/2013 to supplement their response, as further set out in order. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 5/6/2013. (wcl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION

VALERIE MALISSIA VEAZEY LOUCKS
and AMANDA VICTORIA WOODHAM,
Plaintiff,
vs.
SHOREST, LLC, and RHI, INC. d/b/a
SHONEY=S OF CLANTON,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:12cv304-WHA
(wo)

ORDER
This cause is before the court on the Plaintiffs= Response to the Defendants= Motion in
Limine. In its Order, the court gave the Plaintiffs time in which to specifically identify evidence
of other cases or claims they seek to admit at trial and the identity of witnesses through whom
such evidence would be elicited.
The Plaintiffs have provided deposition excerpts from Sharon Biafore in which she refers
to complaints, including complaints of harassment, but then the Plaintiffs merely state in their
brief that they intend to present Ageneral evidence about these claims and how they were
resolved/managed.@ The Plaintiffs are given until noon on May 7, 2013 to supplement their
response and identify specifically the names of the complainants, where they were employed, the
nature of the complaints, the specifics of how the complaints were resolved, and the witness or
witnesses the Plaintiffs intend to call to provide this testimony.
Done this 6th day of May, 2013.
/s/ W. Harold Albritton
W. HAROLD ALBRITTON
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE