Loucks, et al. v. Shorest, LLC, et al.

Filing 70

ORDER that the Plfs are given until noon on 5/7/2013 to supplement their response, as further set out in order. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 5/6/2013. (wcl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION VALERIE MALISSIA VEAZEY LOUCKS and AMANDA VICTORIA WOODHAM, Plaintiff, vs. SHOREST, LLC, and RHI, INC. d/b/a SHONEY=S OF CLANTON, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:12cv304-WHA (wo) ORDER This cause is before the court on the Plaintiffs= Response to the Defendants= Motion in Limine. In its Order, the court gave the Plaintiffs time in which to specifically identify evidence of other cases or claims they seek to admit at trial and the identity of witnesses through whom such evidence would be elicited. The Plaintiffs have provided deposition excerpts from Sharon Biafore in which she refers to complaints, including complaints of harassment, but then the Plaintiffs merely state in their brief that they intend to present Ageneral evidence about these claims and how they were resolved/managed.@ The Plaintiffs are given until noon on May 7, 2013 to supplement their response and identify specifically the names of the complainants, where they were employed, the nature of the complaints, the specifics of how the complaints were resolved, and the witness or witnesses the Plaintiffs intend to call to provide this testimony. Done this 6th day of May, 2013. /s/ W. Harold Albritton W. HAROLD ALBRITTON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?