Nails v. Progressive Insurance Company (MAG+)

Filing 14

ORDERED that Ms. Nails's 13 Objection is OVERRULED and that the 10 Recommendation is ADOPTED; further ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice due to Plf's failure to pay the filing fee within the time allowed by the court. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 6/5/2012. (wcl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
ANGELA DENISE NAILS,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff,
v.
PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE
COMPANY,
Defendant.

CASE NO. 2:12-CV-324-WKW

ORDER
On May 8, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case.
(Doc. # 10.) Plaintiff filed a Response (Doc. # 13), which is construed as an
objection. Upon an independent and de novo review of the Recommendation, see 28
U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), it is ORDERED that Ms. Nails’s objection (Doc. # 13) is
OVERRULED and that the Recommendation (Doc. # 10) is ADOPTED. It is further
ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice due to Plaintiff’s failure
to pay the filing fee within the time allowed by the court.
An appropriate judgment will be entered.
DONE this 5th day of June, 2012.
/s/ W. Keith Watkins
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE