Jimenez v. Carr (INMATE 3)

Filing 15

ORDER ADOPTING 14 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge; DISMISSING the petition for a writ of habeas corpus because petition has failed to demonstrate that the disciplinary action resulting in his loss of privileges for 120 days gives rise to any claim for federal habeas relief or states any claim for a denial of his constitutionalright to due process. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 5/2/14. (djy, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION RENATO C. JIMENEZ, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Petitioner, v. JOHNNIE CARR, Respondent. CASE NO. 2:12-CV-342-TMH ORDER On April 8, 2014, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 14.) Upon an independent review of the file and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED and that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED, because Petitioner has failed to demonstrate that the disciplinary action resulting in his loss of privileges for 120 days gives rise to any claim for federal habeas relief or states any claim for a denial of his constitutional right to due process. A separate final judgment will be entered. DONE this 2nd day of May, 2014. /s W. Keith Watkins CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?