Osburn v. Panetta et al
Filing
186
ORDER directing that, upon consideration of the parties' motions in limine (Doc. Nos. 168 , 177 , 178 , & 179 ), motion to strike (Doc. No. 169 ), and objections (Doc. Nos. 170 , 171 , & 180 ), it is ORDERED that counsel for all parties are to do the following: (1) Meet, in person, by no later than September 11, 2014, to attempt to resolve the motions and objections; and (2) File a jointly prepared report by September 16, 2014,(a) as to which issues in the motions and objections are resolved and which ones remain unresolved and (b), for each and every unresolved issue, setting forth in detail the position of each side. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 9/8/14. (scn, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
SHARON OSBURN,
Plaintiff,
v.
CHUCK HAGEL, Secretary,
Department of Defense,
(Defense Information
Systems Agency),
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:12cv349-MHT
(WO)
ORDER
Upon consideration of the parties' motions in limine
(Doc. Nos. 168, 177, 178, & 179), motion to strike (Doc.
No. 169), and objections (Doc. Nos. 170, 171, & 180), it
is ORDERED that counsel for all parties are to do the
following:
(1) Meet, in person, by no later than September 11,
2014, to attempt to resolve the motions and objections;
and
(2) File a jointly prepared report by September 16,
2014,(a) as to which issues in the motions and objections
are resolved and which ones remain unresolved and (b),
for each and every unresolved issue, setting forth in
detail the position of each side.
DONE, this the 8th day of September, 2014.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?