Pemberton v. United States of America (INMATE 3)

Filing 11

ORDER directing that, no timely objection having been filed to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 10 ), and after a review of the file, the court ADOPTS the Recommendation, and it is hereby ORDERED that this 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion is DENIED with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 9/24/14. (scn, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FORTHE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION

BRADLEY H. PEMBERTON,
Petitioner,
vs.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. 2:12-cv-384-WHA
(WO)

ORDER
No timely objection having been filed to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge
(Doc. #10), and after a review of the file, the court ADOPTS the Recommendation, and it is
hereby
ORDERED that this 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion is DENIED with prejudice.
DONE this 24th day of September, 2014.

/s/ W. Harold Albritton
W. HAROLD ALBRITTON
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE