Powell v. Techtronic Industries Co, Ltd et al

Filing 63

JUDGMENT, the court having been informed that this cause is now settled, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that this lawsuit is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice, with the parties to bear their own costs, as further set out in order; further ORDERING that all outstanding motions are denied as moot; directed the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP; this case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 7/16/15. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist). Furnished to calendar group, AG & WR (terminates Pretrial Conference 07/17/2015; Jury Trial 08/17/2015),(djy, ).

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION CURTIS POWELL, Plaintiff, v. TECHTRONIC INDUSTRIES NORTH AMERICA, INC., et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:12cv401-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT The court having been informed that this cause is now settled, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that this lawsuit is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice, with the parties to bear their own costs and with leave to the parties, within 49 days, to stipulate to a different basis for dismissal or to stipulate to the entry of judgment instead of dismissal, and with leave to any party to file, within 49 days, a motion to have the dismissal set aside and the case reinstated or the settlement enforced, should the settlement not be consummated. It is further ORDERED that all outstanding motions are denied as moot. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil pursuant to Rule 58 of docket the as a Federal final Rules judgment of Procedure. This case is closed. DONE, this the 16th day of July, 2015. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Civil

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?