Brown v. Quality Correctional Healthcare, Inc. et al (INMATE 1)

Filing 14

ORDER that the 10 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as follows: 1. Plaintiff's claims against the Montgomery County Detention Facility are DISMISSED with prejudice in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). 2. The M ontgomery County Detention Facility is DISMISSED as a Defendant in this action. 3. This case with respect to the Plaintiff's claims against the remaining Defendants is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 6/27/2012. (jg, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION NATHAN BROWN, #282959, Plaintiff, vs. QUALITY CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE, INC., et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:12cv443-WHA ORDER No objection having been filed to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #10), entered on June 6, 2012, the court ADOPTS the Recommendation, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Plaintiff’s claims against the Montgomery County Detention Facility are DISMISSED with prejudice in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). 2. The Montgomery County Detention Facility is DISMISSED as a Defendant in this action. 3. This case with respect to the Plaintiff’s claims against the remaining Defendants is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. DONE this 27th day of June, 2012. /s/ W. Harold Albritton W. HAROLD ALBRITTON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?