Brumfield v. Strange et al (INMATE 2)
Filing
25
ORDERED that: 1) The 20 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; 2) Plf's federal claims challenging events which occurred on or before 8/2/2007 are DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to the directives of 28 USC § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i ), as further set out; 3) Plf's challenge to the validity of his confinement in the custody of the AL DOC is DISMISSED without prejudice in accordance with the directives of 28 USC § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii); 4) Plf's pendent state law claim is DISMISSED without prejudice; and 5) This complaint is DISMISSED prior to service of process. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 8/28/2012. (wcl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
GEORGE ARTHUR BRUMFIELD,
#129 996,
Plaintiff,
v.
LUTHER STRANGE, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:12-CV-478-WHA
)
)
)
)
ORDER
The Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (Doc. 20) in this case to which no
timely objections have been filed. After a review of the Recommendation, and after an
independent review of the entire record, the court finds that the Recommendation should be
adopted. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that:
1.
The Recommendation (Doc. 20) of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED;
2.
Plaintiff’s federal claims challenging events which occurred on or before
August 2, 2007 are DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to the directives of
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) as Plaintiff failed to file the complaint with
regard to these allegations within the time prescribed by the applicable period
of limitation;
3.
Plaintiff’s challenge to the validity of his confinement in the custody of the
Alabama Department of Corrections is DISMISSED without prejudice in
accordance with the directives of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii);
4.
Plaintiff’s pendent state law claim is DISMISSED without prejudice; and
5.
This complaint is DISMISSED prior to service of process.
A separate judgment shall issue.
Done this 28th day of August, 2012.
/s/ W. Harold Albritton
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?