Hudson v. Federal Prison Camp Montgomery et al (INMATE 3)

Filing 54

ORDER directing that, there being no timely objection filed to the 53 Recommendation, and after a review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows: (1) The Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED to the e xtent the Defendants seek dismissal of this case due to Plaintiff's failure to exhaust the administrative remedies available to him through the Bureau of Prisons before filing this federal civil action; (2) This case is DISMISSED with prejudice under the provisions of 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) for Plaintiff's failure to exhaust the administrative remedies previously available to him through the Bureau of Prisons. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on March 3, 2015. (scn, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION

DETRINE HUDSON,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
FEDERAL PRISON CAMP MONTGOMERY, )
et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)

CASE NO. 2:12cv-550-WHA
(WO)

ORDER
This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #53),
entered on February 10, 2015. There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation,
and after a review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED as
follows:
1. The Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED to the extent the Defendants seek
dismissal of this case due to Plaintiff’s failure to exhaust the administrative remedies available to
him through the Bureau of Prisons before filing this federal civil action.
2. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice under the provisions of 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a)
for Plaintiff’s failure to exhaust the administrative remedies previously available to him through
the Bureau of Prisons.
DONE this 3rd day of March, 2015.

/s/
W. Harold Albritton
W. HAROLD ALBRITTON
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE