Abro v. Alabama Department of Corrections, et al (INMATE 2)

Filing 7

ORDER that the court ADOPTS the 5 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Plaintiff's motion for injunction, considered as a motion for preliminary injunction 3 is DENIED. 2. This case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 8/1/2012. (jg, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION

DEMETRIUS LAWANA ABRO, #172755,
Plaintiff,
vs.
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:12cv583-WHA
(WO)

ORDER
Upon an independent evaluation and de novo review of this case, including the
Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #5) and the Plaintiff’s objection thereto, the
court finds the objection to be without merit, and it is hereby OVERRULED.
The Plaintiff’s objection merely argues the basis of the Complaint and fails to establish
the requirements for a preliminary injunction at this time in the proceedings. Therefore, the
court ADOPTS the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and it is hereby ORDERED as
follows:
1. Plaintiff’s motion for injunction, considered as a motion for preliminary injunction
(Doc. #3) is DENIED.
2. This case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.
DONE this 1st day of August, 2012.

/s/ W. Harold Albritton
W. HAROLD ALBRITTON
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE