Iberia Bank v. Polk, et al

Filing 83

ORDER: 1. The pretrial conference and trial setting in this case are CONTINUEDGENERALLY; 2. The deadlines set forth in Sections 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, and 9 of the Amended Scheduling Order 50 , and the deadlines set forth in the Court's July 2, 2013 Or der 62 are CONTINUED GENERALLY; 3. The parties shall pursue discovery in this case expeditiously; 4. This case is REFERRED to the assigned magistrate judge for a discovery conference as further set out; 5. The Motion for Extension of Deadline as to Expert Witnesses 73 is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 8/2/2013. (jg, ) TERMINATED: Final Pretrial Conference 02/06/2014; Non-Jury Trial 03/10/2014

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION IBERIABANK, Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM R. POLK, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:12-cv-639-MEF (WO – Do not publish) ORDER On July 31, 2013, the Court held a telephone conference on Defendant William Polk’s Unopposed Motion to Extend Deadlines (Doc. #73), during which the Court and the parties discussed issues involving the discovery, dispositive motion, and trial deadlines in this case. On the morning of the telephone conference, Defendant First Community Bank of Central Alabama (“FCB”) filed a motion to dismiss (Doc. #80), and the Court and the parties discussed the effects of FCB’s motion on the deadlines in this case and the ability of the case to move forward to trial as scheduled. Based on these discussions, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The pretrial conference and trial setting in this case are CONTINUED GENERALLY. 2. The deadlines set forth in Sections 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, and 9 of the Amended Scheduling Order (Doc. #50), and the deadlines set forth in the Court’s July 2, 2013 Order (Doc. #62) are CONTINUED GENERALLY. 3. The parties shall pursue discovery in this case expeditiously. 4. This case is REFERRED to the assigned magistrate judge for a discovery conference to determine what discovery is needed to move this case forward to trial. 5. The Motion for Extension of Deadline as to Expert Witnesses (Doc. #73) is DENIED AS MOOT. DONE this the 2nd day of August, 2013. /s/ Mark E. Fuller UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?