Murray v. United States of America (INMATE 3)

Filing 13

ORDER directing that, no timely objection having been filed to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 12 ), and after a review of the file, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: (1) The court ADOPTS the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge; (2) This 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion is DENIED, and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 10/8/14. (scn, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FORTHE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION CEDRIC MURRAY, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Petitioner, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. CASE NO. 2:12-cv-710-WHA (WO) ORDER No timely objection having been filed to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #12), entered on September 15, 2014, and after a review of the file, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The court ADOPTS the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. 2. This 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 motion is DENIED, and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. DONE this 8th day of October, 2014. /s/ W. Harold Albritton W. HAROLD ALBRITTON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?