Jones v. Corizon et al (INMATE 1)
ORDER that Plaintiff's 87 Objection is OVERRULED, the court ADOPTS the thorough and well-reasonsed 83 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and it it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment are G RANTED. 2. The Plaintiffs Motions for Summary Judgment are DENIED. 3. Summary Judgment is GRANTED in favor of the Defendants, and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. 4. No costs are taxed. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 8/18/2015. (dmn, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FORTHE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
THOMAS EDWARD JONES, #140289,
CORIZON, et al.,
CASE NO. 2:12-cv-786-WHA
This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #83),
entered on July 6, 2015, and the Plaintiff’s Objection (Doc. #87), filed on July 23, 2015.
The court has conducted an independent evaluation and de novo review of the
Recommendation, the Objection, and the file in this case. The Objection relies on the same
claims and arguments which were made to the Magistrate Judge and addressed at length in the
After a de novo review, the court agrees with the Recommendation’s findings that the
Plaintiff has failed to demonstrate a genuine dispute of material fact as to the issue of deliberate
indifference and also as to the complaint that his constitutional rights are being violated by
assessment of a $3 co-payment for partial payment of costs attendant to each treatment for
sinusitis. Therefore, Plaintiff’s Objection is OVERRULED, the court ADOPTS the thorough
and well-reasoned Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and it is hereby ORDERED as
1. The Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment are GRANTED.
2. The Plaintiff’s Motions for Summary Judgment are DENIED.
3. Summary Judgment is GRANTED in favor of the Defendants, and this case is
DISMISSED with prejudice.
4. No costs are taxed.
DONE this 18th day of August, 2015.
/s/ W. Harold Albritton
W. HAROLD ALBRITTON
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?